Monday, April 13, 2020

Article Synopsys on Public Administration

Article Synopsys on Public Administration The article under consideration is called Post-foundational development management – power, politics and complexity and written by Christ Mowles (2010).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Article Synopsys on Public Administration specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The author discusses the place of management theories in learning and development theories as well as how they are applied to introduce changes and improvement. Particularly, the author focuses on post-foundational management theory based on the principles of emergence. The work combines empirical and theoretical framework for analyzing the major aspects and strategies needed to upgrading the development management. Investigating future perspectives of improvements and programs, the research also places an emphasis on such concepts as predictability, control, emergency, and system change. All the above-described aspects are considered in regional context that provides a favorable ground for more effective implementation of theoretical approaches. In addition, the author provides some historical facts and a comparative analysis of theories for the audience to have clearer understanding of their essence. While discussing particular theories, the author resorts to assessment of post-foundational management within the local context believing that this principle creates a number of positive perspectives for improvement of public sphere. To enlarge on this, Mowles believes that strategies and generalized plans are always perceived in particular contexts with certain actors participating in political cooperation aimed at grouping their efforts and sharing their experience in overcoming particular problems. In this respect, an alternative theory put forward by the research draws on the concept of emergence, a condition under which all governmental and managerial procedures can be considerably improved. This is explained by the fact that qui ck adjustment to changes creates a number of benefits in critical situations, especially when time is of primary importance.Advertising Looking for essay on public administration? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Considering these concepts, the author reaches a conclusion that, even if future perspectives and strategies are idealized and, sometimes, far from reality, planning and projecting intension can better assist in meeting the future goals rather than taking no measures at all. In the article, the author presents a well-planned presentation of arguments and approaches used to assert the validity and reliability of facts. More importantly, the author has managed to sustain the balance between theoretical and empirical information applied. It should also be stressed that the main hypothesis of the paper is quite specific and consistent with the proposed supportive arguments. However, excessive reference to theoret ical materials provides a number of ambiguities that prevent readers from understanding the connection between practical and theoretical information. Despite that, the major strength of the article lies in a multidimensional approach the author has chosen for considering one theory within different contexts. The writing style of the article refers to scientific genre, because the researcher resorts to a great number of business and scientific terms. Nevertheless, the abundance of terminology does not distort the overall impression from the text. The information is logical and consistent where each argument is supported by evidence and facts. Besides the explanation for the key concepts, such as emergency, development management, post-foundational management, emergence, and future perspective, is provided in a well-grounded and detailed manner. In general, the article will be of great significance and relevance to the sphere of public administrations because it provides readers with a number of important theoretical approaches aimed at improving public infrastructure. What is more important is that consideration of local context can give a better picture of how management theories contribute to the improvement of administration policies. Reference List Mowles, C. (March, 2010). Post-Foundational Development Management – Power, Politics and Complexity. Public Development and Administration. 30(2), pp. 149-158.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Article Synopsys on Public Administration specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More

Saturday, April 11, 2020

Huxley Vs. Orwell - Harvard Law Review Sample Essay

Huxley Vs. Orwell - Harvard Law Review Sample EssayIn honor of the turn of the century, a look at Huxley vs. Orwell in a Harvard Law Review sample essay. The essay was initially commissioned by the senior editor of the school's newspaper, the Crimson. I think the choice was appropriate as the stakes were higher for the author who was critiquing the quality of literature being produced in the country.Orwell, of course, would later consider Huxley as an authority and even praise him for his writing. In the essay, the author presented several questions and I will outline some of the answers in this article.To begin with, he asked what made Huxley such a superior writer? He also wanted to know why the works of Huxley were considered better than the works of Orwell. He saw the debate as being about the quality of literature in the United States. The essay also made the point that many of Huxley's contemporaries were much more famous than he was, but I disagree with that assessment.As far as the quality of the literature, I do not know that there is much doubt that Orwell was a great and productive writer. In my opinion, Huxley was a very good writer, and I'm sure he had excellent creative talent. The difference between the two writers is that Huxley had a larger impact upon American culture than Orwell ever would have, which caused his influence to grow more dramatically than Orwell's influence.I also do not think the debate is about the quality of literature, it is more of a dispute over the legitimacy of its authors. There are all too many people who say that Huxley is a fraud, that he doesn't deserve the recognition and that he was never more than a mediocre writer. While this is very true, the fact is that he was very influential and many of his novels made their way into Hollywood and into the hearts of moviegoers.For instance, one of the reasons that Huxley's work is so respected is that his work deals with contemporary society. It's also the case that Huxley' s works deal with a few very controversial issues in society, such as drug abuse, class, and totalitarianism. In my opinion, these topics are issues that are more important to be addressed in the books that are being written now than they were in the past. This does not mean that the work of Huxley is not important, only that the demands of today are different than the demands of the past.It seems to me that the authors of these books should receive greater credit than they currently do. In fact, many of them are deeply influenced by the writings of Orwell. If you were to call a Hollywood producer and ask them what the differences were between Huxley and Orwell, they might laugh at you. The truth is that while Huxley's works are considered inferior to Orwell's, both writers have had an enormous influence on American society and literature.